Tbt Provisions In Regional Trade Agreements

The free trade agreements concluded by the United States also contain a chapter containing provisions on technical barriers to trade that must be respected in order to benefit from preferential treatment under the agreement. These chapters may be consulted in accordance with free trade agreements. • Introduction to WTO rules on technical barriers to trade and understanding the TBT Agreement The growing importance of TBT measures is also reflected in the content of regional trade agreements (SAAs). Around 77% of FIFGs contain at least one provision on OOP measures and, since 2010, the inclusion of such provisions in FIFGs has been systematic (McDaniels et al., 2018). Today, the provisions of the RTA relating to OEEs include, inter alia, the development and application of standards, technical regulations, conformity assessments, but also transparency, equivalence, harmonisation and regulatory cooperation; and while some IFIs contain these provisions in the form of individual articles, others, including more recent articles, contain a separate section or chapter on technical barriers to trade. The WTO agreement has inspired much of the content of atR in this area, so that most of the RTA`s OBT provisions tend to reflect the provisions of the WTO OBT Agreement, while few go beyond the latter (Molina and Khoroshavina, 2015). The USTR WTO & Multilateral Affairs (WAMA) office is responsible for trade negotiations and negotiations as well as policy coordination on issues related to technical barriers to trade and standards-related activities. Lower tariffs have increased concerns about the application of non-tariff measures to restrict imports (Malouche and Cadot 2012). Technical barriers to trade (TBT), which include standards, technical rules and conformity assessment procedures1, are among the types of non-tariff measures that have increased significantly over the past decade. During the period 2005-2017, on average, 1400 OEE measures were notified to the WTO each year, compared to an average of 625 for the period 1995-2005. This increase in the number of OEE measures has been accompanied by an increase in the number of specific trade concerns raised by wto OBT Committee members since 2005, from 128 in 2005 to 548 in 2017. • inform members of mutual recognition events and agreements under the OBT agreement.

The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (the “TBT”) establishes rules and procedures for the development, acceptance and application of voluntary product standards, binding technical rules and procedures (such as testing or certification) that determine whether a particular product complies with those standards or regulations. The objective of the TBT Agreement is to prevent the use of technical requirements as unnecessary barriers to trade. Most PDOs also have their own dispute settlement procedures and, as the RTA`s OEE provisions are identical (or similar) to the provisions of the OECG Agreement, the risk of overlap and conflicting decisions between the WTO and the rta Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (MSDs) is latent. Such overlap, often referred to as a jurisdictional understudy, can arise when a dispute can be brought against the WTO DSM RTA and DSM (Marceau, 2015, marceau and Wyatt, 2010), and this can occur if it is an identical (or similar) provision under the ATR and the WTO. . . .


  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加